Planning
What the court actually said about “housing affordability”
The judgment rejected the idea that luxury apartments necessarily deliver affordability simply by adding supply.
Placeholder copy. This entry exists so the site layout can be built and checked against the approved design. It is not published reporting. Replace or delete it before launch.
The Court of Appeal held that simply adding expensive apartments does not, without more, meet the City Plan’s housing-affordability outcome. The matter was sent back for redetermination.
Council is now seeking special leave to appeal to the High Court.
What the judgment actually decided
The court’s reasoning turned on the wording of the overall outcome, not on the merits of any individual tower.
For residents, the practical question is what happens to applications already lodged under the disputed interpretation.
